What we do
We help companies to effectively prevent and manage compliance violations, whether minor or severe and irrespective of the specific regulation or situation. The increase in decision-making competence is monitored and verified through data analytics. Our platform currently has a capacity of 100,000 users who can improve their decision-making behavior simultaneously.
- Cloud-based (SaaS), easy handling: push the button and get valuable data
- Board-ready scorecards in real time
- Multi-site applicable: all countries, all industries, 24/7
- Multi-stage applicable: mergers and current operations
- Multi-depth applicable: basic or advanced
- Usage: permanently, selectively or recurrently; preventive or post compliance violation
- No significant workload for customer
- Set up in one day
As a result, we empower and persuade executives to do the right thing without losing sight of the company's purpose. That pays into the bottom line
Executives must deal with complex and dynamic situations, often high risks, growing ethical requirements, and changing conditions such as different legal systems and increasing regulation - and not just a rule. Furthermore, people don’t have a standardized decision-making architecture. Making decisions is an individual matter.
That is why we strengthen decision-making behavior through self-control, analytical skills, sound judgment, and ultimately, based on this, the courage to put the result into practice. Our training platform provides individual evidence of decision-making competence among executives (top, senior, and below) in the areas of economics, compliance, risk management and ethics. Ask for our performance results.
Our platform can therefore be used to demonstrate the effectiveness of global corporate compliance programs in practice and across the board. This ultimately leads to profits being secured by avoiding or reducing penalties and fines (governmental and enforcement authorities in Europe and the US), and to internal costs being reduced on the basis of objective measurements. It's a Win-Win.
Instead, the compliance measures currently used in the economy are hardly suitable for providing insights that could prevent economic crime or legal misconduct to any significant extent. The mere accumulation of statistical data (repeated communication of rules by eLearning) or A.I. and Gen A.I. based apps (to give advice how to behave) and the use of forensic analysis after compliance violations lead to a false sense of security and retrospective fines, with disappointing results in terms of prevention.
Why is that? Prevalent corporate compliance programs are limited to the memorization of rules: Here's the rule, apply it! But humans do not necessarily follow the rule. They weigh up whether it makes sense to obey the rule or not. Rules knowledge is good and needed, but not sufficient. Ludaciti has done the test. Based on empirical data, we can show that the application of rules under real life conditions - after completion of the standard compliance programs - is clearly unsatisfactory.
Since current applications (A.I. and Gen A.I.) continue the rule-based concept and operate without reason, they can at best assist managers in quickly accessing more helpful information when used in a contextualized manner. Complex problems still need to be solved by qualified individuals. Thus, A.I. at its current level can be helpful, but isn't a game changer in the field of corporate decision-making behavior.
Nevertheless, most companies invest year after year in e-learning and classroom training, as well as in costly risk assessments, the results of which can be considered insufficient in terms of the “human factor”. Not surprising, that leniency based solely on training of rules is no longer guaranteed by European and US law enforcement agencies.
